CM Jagan unlawful belongings case got here to probe earlier than Supreme courtroom Supreme Court docket: Investigation in Jagan’s illegality case within the Supreme Court docket

AP CM YS Jagan’s unlawful belongings case was heard within the Supreme Court docket in the present day (February 13). It’s recognized that CBI and ED investigations are happening individually in Jagan’s unlawful belongings case. Earlier, the Excessive Court docket had dominated that the CBI and ED investigations have been performed concurrently, however solely after the judgment within the CBI circumstances, the ED circumstances must be judged. Difficult this, Bharti Cement, Vijayasai Reddy and others have filed a petition within the Supreme Court docket that the ED investigation must be performed solely after the completion of the CBI investigation. Then again, ED challenged the Telangana Excessive Court docket judgment within the Supreme Court docket.

A bench of Supreme Court docket judges Justice Sanjeev Khanna heard the petition. Ought to judgment be given in ED circumstances after judgment in CBI circumstances? Or? The Supreme Court docket Bench has expressed the opinion that the ability to determine is reserved to the trial courtroom below Part 309 of the CrPC. The bench stated that it’s going to additionally give instructions to this extent. Within the meantime, senior counsel Tushar Mehta, who appeared within the courtroom on behalf of the ED, dropped at the discover of the bench that there are different circumstances in addition to this case. The Supreme Court docket has introduced that the following listening to will likely be postponed for two weeks.

See extra

Supreme Courtroom notices to Revanth Reddy in money for vote case

Supreme Courtroom: Telangana CM Revanth Reddy acquired a shock within the vote banknote case. Supreme Courtroom issued discover to him on this case on Friday. Former minister and BRS chief Jagdish Reddy has filed a switch petition within the Supreme Courtroom to switch the trial of this case which created a sensation within the Telugu states from Telangana to Madhya Pradesh. A bench of Justice BR Gavai and Justice Sandeep Mohta took up the listening to on this petition at the moment. On this event, the Supreme Courtroom has issued notices to Telangana authorities and different defendants together with Revanth Reddy who’s an accused within the case. It has issued instructions to answer to the notices inside 4 weeks. It has been 60 days since Revanth took cost as CM. On this order, the difficulty of forex notes for voting has come to the fore and notices from the Supreme Courtroom are inflicting pleasure within the Congress circles.

Revanth and Telangana authorities’s response to the notices has turn out to be essential. Presently, the Dwelling Division can be underneath Revanth. Preparations are being made to begin the trial on the banknote case quickly. Jagdish Reddy delivered to the eye of the Supreme Courtroom that there’s a risk of influencing the investigation on this case with Revanth because the CM and Dwelling Minister. Responding to this, the bench mentioned that they’d be watching if it impacts the investigation. In his petition, Jagadish Reddy talked about that 88 circumstances have been registered in opposition to Revanth Reddy and the Supreme Courtroom’s earlier verdict stopping the trial within the vote banknote case. Additionally, Revanth gave a warning to the cops who had been within the earlier BRS authorities.

Revanth warned that inside 100 days of the formation of the Congress authorities, cops who did because the earlier authorities could be paraded bare. Jagadish Reddy additionally offered the small print concerning this to the Supreme Courtroom. As Revanth is the Chief Minister, there’s a likelihood to affect the investigation and requested to switch the case to the neighboring state of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Together with Jagadish Reddy, Kalvakuntla Sanjay, Mohammed Ali and Satyavati Radhod additionally filed the petition. The court docket thought of these and issued notices to Revanth. With this, stress has began within the ranks of the Hastam get together that this case will carry issues for Revanth within the coming days.

In the meantime, in 2015 when KCR was the CM of Telangana, a case was registered in opposition to Revanth Reddy for utilizing forex notes. Revanth supplied cash to MLC Stephenson to vote for TDP candidate in MLA Kota MLC election. Then Revanth was working president of TTDP. ACB officers caught Stephenson red-handed whereas he was paying Rs.50 lakh at residence. Revanth was in jail for a couple of days on this case. After that, he was launched after the court docket granted bail. The case continues to be ongoing. It stays to be seen what’s going to occur within the coming days.

See extra

Supreme Courtroom provides inexperienced sign to Telangana Police Constable Recruitment

TS Police Constable Recruitment: 15,750 candidates chosen for constable jobs in Telangana obtained aid within the Supreme Courtroom. It’s dependable info that the petition filed by the Police Recruitment Board (TSLPRB) within the Supreme Courtroom has been given a optimistic verdict. With this, finalizing the constable outcomes introduced on October 4 final yr, the ultimate announcement shall be issued from TSLPRB. It’s recognized that the highest officers of the Police Appointment Board have approached the Supreme Courtroom difficult the Excessive Courtroom Division Bench’s resolution to arrange an knowledgeable committee. 15,750 individuals have been chosen for 16,604 constable posts in varied departments of the police division.

The officers of TSLPRB not too long ago went to the Supreme Courtroom difficult the choice of the Division Bench of the Excessive Courtroom to arrange an knowledgeable committee to appropriate the judgment given by the only bench of the Excessive Courtroom on the errors made within the appointment of constables. On this context, it’s reliably recognized that the settlement was made in favor of the board. It’s reported that the officers of police, jails, fireplace, transport and excise departments had been knowledgeable that the ultimate outcomes given by TSLPRB on October 4 are closing. It’s dependable info that the Ministry of Human Sources has secretly given orders to organize the appointment papers of the respective departments. Record of particulars of chosen candidates and different letters had been despatched to increased officers. It’s reported that the road has been cleared for the posts of driver and mechanic.

It’s recognized that in April final yr, the Police Recruitment Board had launched a notification for filling up a complete of 17,516 police posts. Of those, 587 are for SI and equal posts, and 16,604 for constable equal posts. From April 2022, the TSLPRB board carried out the preliminary, bodily occasions and closing examinations for 587 SI jobs and introduced the ultimate leads to final August itself. Because of this, 587 candidates chosen for SI jobs are present process coaching on the State Police Academy. Recruitment strategy of candidates began from April 2022. Ranging from small disputes with pregnant candidates, to the interpretation questions within the closing examination, the candidates approached the Excessive Courtroom in lots of circumstances. Nevertheless, TSLPRB adopted the directions of the Excessive Courtroom now and again and continued the recruitment course of.

Right rationalization from the board..
Throughout the arguments within the Supreme Courtroom, from the time the notification was given to the discharge of the ultimate outcomes, the whole lot was carried out based on the tactic, and it was ensured that there have been no technical deficiencies. It’s recognized that the Supreme Courtroom, which has completely examined all the problems, has given the inexperienced sign with out elevating any objections to the board’s arguments. The time period of the knowledgeable committee appointed by the Telangana Excessive Courtroom will even expire. With this, it’s reliably recognized that this committee additionally adheres to the board’s argument.

Appointment paperwork shall be issued from 12..
It’s recognized that these chosen for the roles from February 12 shall be given appointment papers from February 12. The CMO and the Residence Division have issued directions to make printing preparations to present the appointment papers to the candidates from February 12. If potential, there’s a chance that CM Revanth Reddy will present the appointment paperwork to the chosen candidates earlier than or after February 12.

See extra

Disappointment in Supreme Court docket for Margadarsi on switch of circumstances

Margadarsi Case: Supreme Court docket rejects plea to switch Margadarsi chit fund circumstances to Telangana. Dismissed the petition filed by the information. The petition contended that there was no ample motive to switch the circumstances registered in AP. The Supreme Court docket has made it clear that there is no such thing as a intention to permit information petitions. She determined to method the AP Excessive Court docket if she desires to remain the trial of the case. The Supreme Court docket commented that if the case is struck out, all of the petitions are futile. If there may be any want, the Supreme Court docket has recommended {that a} appropriate petition needs to be filed within the AP Excessive Court docket.

See extra

Chandrababu And Jagan Instances Had been Investigated In The Supreme Court docket | Ability Case Supreme Court docket: Jagan and Chandrababu instances will likely be heard individually

Chandrababu Ability case: The case of TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu was investigated within the ability improvement rip-off case. The federal government has challenged the bail granted to Chandrababu within the ability case by the AP Excessive Court docket within the Supreme Court docket. A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court docket headed by Justice Bela M Trivedi and Justice Pankaj Mittal heard the matter. The bench stated that the trial will likely be held after the decision on the quash petition was handed through the earlier listening to. The attorneys for Ichandrababu requested for time to file the counter as they’re learning the decision now that it has come to trial. With this, the bench adjourned the listening to to February 12.

Earlier than that, a listening to was held on a petition filed earlier than a unique tribunal on why the investigation of Jagan’s property case was delayed. YCP insurgent MP Raghuramakrishnam Raju has filed a petition searching for cancellation of Jagan’s bail and switch of Jagan’s instances from Telugu states. A listening to on two separate petitions was held within the Supreme Court docket on Friday. As a part of this investigation, the bench questioned why the investigation of Jagan’s properties is being delayed. On behalf of the CBI, Solicitor Basic Tushar Mehta instructed the Supreme Court docket that they aren’t accountable. The counsel for the CBI delivered to the eye of the court docket that that they had nothing to do with the adjournments within the decrease court docket.

Justice Sanjeev Khanna requested if the investigation company just isn’t concerned, who’s it? Talking on behalf of Jagan’s attorneys, they referred to the orders given by the Telangana Excessive Court docket as per the orders of the Supreme Court docket to speedily hear the petitions filed in opposition to the general public representatives. Subsequently, Jagan’s attorneys requested the court docket to finish the listening to on the petition. The bench made it clear that they aren’t closing the listening to on these petitions. Jagan’s attorneys requested for a three-month deadline because the Excessive Court docket had given a suo moto order, after which a evaluation needs to be performed. What’s using time? The bench commented that the result’s nowhere to be seen.

The bench requested why there have been so many adjournments and so many delays. Jagan’s lawyer Niranjan Reddy delivered to the discover of the bench that the petitioner had filed the petition right here with a political view. Petitioner Pi Niranjan Reddy instructed the court docket that the get together has taken motion in opposition to him and that he has been appearing opposite to the actions of the get together for the previous three years. He stated that these petitions have been filed right here as a result of the disqualification petition was filed in opposition to Raghurama Raju. Nonetheless, Justice Sanjeev Khanna responded that they aren’t trying into political issues.. they’re solely trying into authorized issues. The primary level right here is why the trial is delayed. The bench requested whether or not Anna had resolved a single discharge petition since then. The bench of Justice Sanjeev Khanna introduced that the following listening to will likely be held within the first a part of April.

Supreme Courtroom Has Stayed The Sale Of Visakha Ramanaidu’s Studio Area Into Plots | Visakha Ramanaidu Studio : Key orders of Supreme Courtroom on Visakha Ramanaidu Studio

Supreme Courtroom Visakha Ramanaidu Studio: The Supreme Courtroom has issued notices to the AP authorities within the case of Visakha Ramanaidu’s lands. The Supreme Courtroom stayed the structure and sale of Visakha Ramanaidu’s studio lands. The Supreme Courtroom issued notices to the State Authorities and the respondents. Visakha MLA Velagapudi Ramakrishnababu approached the Supreme Courtroom saying that area was allotted to Rama Naidu studio in Visakha just for movie settings and shootings however the land is being offered as actual property plots.

The Supreme Courtroom heard the petition filed by Velagapudi Ramakrishna Babu. It has been clarified to Ramanaidu Studio that these lands shall not be used for any actions aside from the necessities specified within the authorities order dated September 13, 2003. In 2003, the then authorities allotted 35 acres of land to Ramanaidu Studio for use for movie functions. This land is on a hill. Ramanaidu constructed a studio at some place right here.

The state authorities has allowed the vacant land to be laid out towards coastal norms and used for different actions. Visakha East MLA Velagapudi Ramakrishnababu challenged this order given by the state authorities within the Excessive Courtroom. However this petition was dismissed by the Excessive Courtroom. MLA Velagapudi Ramakrishnababu approached the Supreme Courtroom after the Excessive Courtroom dismissed the case with out even giving discover. The bench of Justice Abhay and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan performed an inquiry on Ramakrishna Babu’s petition.

Why was the land allotted? Have you ever laid out the structure now, have you ever taken up the actions? The bench questioned the petitioner’s lawyer. The petitioner’s counsel stated that land has been allotted for the development of a film studio in Visakhapatnam, and accordingly, with out taking over any work there, the structure has been made and it has been stored prepared on the market. Because of this, the bench directed the federal government to not undertake any actions besides the necessities allotted in 2003. It despatched notices to the state authorities and different respondents to reply by March 11 this yr.

After the formation of the YSRCP authorities in AP, there have been allegations of land disputes in Visakhapatnam, together with the Ramanaidu studio situation. Earlier there have been allegations that this studio had modified arms. What occurred subsequent was that producer and studio proprietor Daggubati Suresh Babu began promoting the plot. However with the keep of the Supreme Courtroom, the land situation has now turn out to be controversial.